The Covid-19 Coronavirus Pandemic Is 10 Times Worse Than You Think

Ever since the coronavirus reached the U.S., officials and citizens alike have gauged the severity of the spread by tracking one measure in particular: How many new cases are confirmed through testing each day. However, it has been clear all along that this number is an understatement because of testing shortfalls.

Now a research team at Columbia University has built a mathematical model that gives a much more complete — and scary — picture of how much virus is circulating in our communities.

It estimates how many people are never counted because they never get tested. And it answers a second question that is arguably even more crucial — but that until now has not been reliably estimated: On any given day, what is the total number of people who are actively infectious? This includes those who may have been infected on previous days but are still shedding virus and capable of spreading disease.

The model's conclusion: On any given day, the actual number of active cases — people who are newly infected or still infectious — is likely 10 times that day's official number of reported cases.

The model has not been published or peer-reviewed yet, but lead researcher, Jeffrey Shaman, an infectious disease specialist at Columbia University, shared the data exclusively with NPR. Here are more of the startling takeaways.

Missed cases remain a massive problem

To come up with their bottom line estimate, the researchers' first step was to estimate, for each day of the outbreak so far, how many people actually became infectious. Then they compared that with the number who got tested and counted as a confirmed case.

Covid-19 mutation variants Februay 2021 update

Back in the spring last year, a 45-year-old man went to the Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston because of a COVID-19 infection. Doctors treated him with steroids and discharged him five days later.

But the COVID infection never went away — for 154 days. "He was readmitted to the hospital several times over the subsequent five months for recurrence of his COVID-19 infection and severe pneumonia," says infectious disease doctor Jonathan Li at Harvard Medical School who helped to treat the man.

"So this is an extraordinary individual," Li says.

So extraordinary in fact, that this man's case is offering scientists surprising clues about where the new coronavirus virus variants emerged, and why they're causing explosive outbreaks on three continents.

To be clear here, the man wasn't what doctors call a "long hauler," or a person who clears a COVID infection and then continues to have health problems for months. This man had living, growing virus in body for five months, Li says. The same infection lasted for five months.

"That is one of the remarkable aspects of this case," Li says. "In fact, he was highly infectious even five months after the initial diagnosis."

Using UVC Ultraviolet Light to kill the Covid-19 virus.

Some recent studies confirm that SARS-CoV-2 is one of the viruses, along with other types of coronaviruses, that can be killed by ultraviolet light rays.

Actually, we've known that UV light kills a lot of different germs since the late 1800s when scientists discovered that shorter wavelengths of ultraviolet light rays emitted by the sun — what we now call ultraviolet-C rays or UVC light — could kill bacteria. And unlike the longer wavelengths of the sun's UV light, UVC rays don't naturally hit the Earth's surface, so they're particularly lethal for microbes that haven't had a chance to adapt to them.

Since then, UVC technology has been used for sanitation. Hospitals and water treatment plants, for example, rely on the rays to kill mold, viruses and bacteria. And with the promising research into COVID-19-killing potential, UVC light-emitting machines are being utilized more — popping up in empty subway cars and even the air ducts of many public places, including restaurants.

And the technology is making its way into consumer culture as well, with free-standing UVC lamps meant for your home or office. They're often labeled as desk lamps or table lights and priced in the $50 to $100 range. Alternatively, there are even cheaper, more mobile ultraviolet gadgets such as handheld wands, or light boxes with lids, that are promoted as safe, easy-cleaning tools for small objects such as phones, computer keyboards and eyeglasses.

But here's the bad news.

Join the 10 day plan to beat Covid-19 at 10days.us !

Join the 10 day plan to beat Covid-19 at 10days.us !

(* 2023 - I took that 10days.us site down since it's moment had passed and no-one listened, and I didn't have the money to keep it up!)

Vaccines - Updated February 2021

Mass vaccination campaigns are under way in the fight back against the coronavirus.

A range of vaccines, designed in completely different ways, are being used to reduce people's chances of getting sick, needing hospital treatment or dying.

And two new vaccines have just been shown to work in large scale clinical trials.

Why do we need a vaccine?

It is more than a year since the virus first emerged, yet the vast majority of people are still vulnerable to the virus.

The restrictions on our lives are the only thing holding the virus in check as they reduce opportunities for the virus to spread.

Vaccines teach our bodies to fight the infection and are "the" exit strategy from the pandemic.

Comparing the Vaccines:

In short, any authorised vaccine offered to you is a good one to take.

 

In February, US regulators formally approved the single-shot Johnson & Johnson coronavirus vaccine - the latest to get the green light.

Unlike Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, which use new mRNA vaccine technology and require two shots, the Johnson & Johnson vaccine uses a common cold virus that has been engineered to make it harmless. It then safely carries part of the coronavirus's genetic code into the body. This is enough for the body to recognise the threat and then learn to fight coronavirus.

 

Dr Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has said that all the vaccines available in the US were good vaccines, and stressed that the Johnson & Johnson jab is "not the weaker vaccine".

The concern comes down varying to efficacy data released from clinical trials - but those figures aren't all they appear to be, say experts.

Ventilation is very Important in reducing risk of Covid-19 transmission and exposure.

Role of Ventilation in Controlling SARS-CoV-2 Transmission SAGE-EMG Executive Summary

Ventilation is an important factor in mitigating against the risk of far-field (>2m) aerosol transmission, but has no impact on other transmission routes (high confidence).

The importance of far-field aerosol transmission is not yet known, but evidence suggests it is a risk in poorly ventilated spaces (medium confidence).

Far-field aerosol transmission depends on the interaction of multiple factors including the viral emission rate, the ventilation rate, the duration of exposure, the environmental conditions and the number of occupants. It is more important to improve ventilation in multi-occupant spaces with very low ventilation rates than in spaces that are already adequately ventilated (high confidence).

Activities that may generate high levels of aerosol (singing, loud speech, aerobic activity) are likely to pose the greatest risk; in some spaces even enhanced ventilation may not fully mitigate this risk (medium confidence).

Virus survival in air decreases with increasing temperature and humidity. In most environments this effect is likely to be less important than the ventilation rate, however environments with low temperature and low humidity (e.g. chilled food processing, cold stores) may pose an enhanced risk (medium confidence).

Providing the ventilation rate remains the same, increasing the occupancy of a space increases the probability of airborne transmission by four fold. Exposure risk may be further increased if distances between people are reduced to <2m. (medium confidence).

Measurements of elevated CO2 levels in indoor air are an effective method of identifying poor ventilation in multi-occupant spaces. In low occupancy or large volume spaces a low level of CO2 cannot necessarily be used as an indicator that ventilation is sufficient to mitigate transmission risks (medium confidence).

Government Best Practices - PLEASE take our Advice!

Many worldwide government leaders are not qualified to manage the handling of a pandemic like Covid-19, and many have made major mistakes for over a year now. We are not here to blame, and we understand that day-to-day government operations do not normally include management of an airborne infectious disease pandemic. So, we ask that, for the benefit of all people everywhere, governments follow these simple but effective guidelines in managing and then eradicating the Covid-19 pandemic. First of all, Join the 10 day simultaneous confinement recommended at 10days.us! Help make it happen and slow covid down immediately!

1) Most importantly, random testing should be done by region, as all other testing is skewed and biased. The only way to know the real rate of increase or decrease of positivity, or past infection, or of a specific mutation or variant in a population is through 100% random testing of the population group. Even a small sample size, if done properly, will give truer results than simply collecting data from those who get tested.

2) Covid only hospitals should be built (in the UK they call them Nightingale hospitals) and all covid patients should be moved there and treated there. This involves building living and sleeping areas on-site for the doctors and nurses who work at the covid hospitals. This will provide a great economy of money and resources, as well as protect existing regular hospitals (which will have a reduced operation and staff as some of their staff will have to move to the covid hospitals). Alternatively, some existing hospital facilities can be turned over 100% to treating covid patiens. Thus no mixing of covid patients and other hospitalized patients occurs and a major vector of transmission is eliminated.

HEPA Air Cleaners can help reduce indoor coronavirus exposure

Engineers and doctors say that air cleaning devices could play an important role in protecting your family from COVID-19 — especially as people start spending more time indoors as outdoor air temperatures fall in the Northern Hemisphere.

"It's a relatively easy way to get clean air in a place where people are in close contact," says Joseph Gardner Allen, an associate professor of exposure assessment science who directs the Healthy Buildings program at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. "It's a simple plug and play solution in that area." (He bought one in March.)

With new attention on the role that aerosolized microdroplets could play in the spread of COVID-19, should you rush out to buy a portable air cleaner for home use?

The frustrating short answer is, "It depends."

It's accepted that the coronavirus can move in multiple ways, though less is understood about how each contributes to transmission of the disease. Those possible transmission methods include short-range airborne particles, ballistic droplets from coughing or sneezing, long-range airborne particles and contaminated surfaces.

Portable air cleaners can limit the spread of the virus via long-range airborne particles by capturing most of those particles in a HEPA filter and cleaning the air at a rate of up to six times per hour. In a typical home without an air cleaner, the air gets fully changed out about once every two hours through air leakage, often aided by mechanical ventilation systems in newer houses.

So, in the right circumstances, portable air cleaners offer an additional layer of protection.

If you're living by yourself and you don't have guests over, it's not going to add any protection (against COVID-19, anyway ... you may want one to combat cat dander or wildfire smoke).

Some coronavirus antibodies tests could put public at risk

Poor regulation of antibodies tests - that could indicate if someone has had coronavirus - could be putting the public at risk, doctors have warned.

The U.K. Royal College of Pathologists has written to the health secretary, calling for rules to be tightened on kits sold direct to consumers.

The letter warns they can "mislead the public and put individuals at risk".

No antibodies test has been officially approved for at-home use in the UK - but many different types are available.

It is still not known whether having antibodies will protect people from a second infection.

The doctors say the tests should not be used without "professional back-up", must "give the right result" and be "properly readable".

A Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency official said it had "worked collaboratively with cross-government agencies at pace to prevent non-compliant antibody test kits being placed into the UK market".

But Royal College of Pathologists president Prof Jo Martin said: "Currently, if you buy a test on the internet or you buy it in certain boutiques or shops, we can't guarantee that the quality of that is of an appropriate standard.

"We can't guarantee that the result will be easy to interpret or that it will be not misleading."

An analysis of 41 antibodies tests sold to the public in the UK, seen by the BBC's Newsnight programme before publication in the medical journal BMJ Open, found almost a third provided incomplete and inaccurate information.

A number claimed to offer "peace of mind".

But just 10% had made documents available to support their claims, academics from the Universities of Birmingham and Warwick found.

What information has been released about how kits were assessed shows most were tested on small numbers of patients only - just a few dozen, all of whom had been admitted to hospital.

Covid-19 Coronavirus Recovery Help

People who have had Covid-19 Coronavirus often never feel completely healthy again. Many of us cannot exercise as well or as often, and many have persistent fatigue of varying degrees. Our lungs don't work as well, and our muscles feel sore for no reason. Sometimes there are bodily aches and pains, perhaps as a result of kidney damage. Often these problems still exist for 3, 4 or more months after testing negative after having the virus.

We ask that the world's governments and scientists and health organizations investigate the following:

1) Heat and Humidity for clearing Covid-19 from the lungs once infected. Many cultures and individuals believe that wet saunas and / or dry saunas help the lungs. We want studies to be done which test the recovery of Covid-19 positive individuals with both heat and humidity (a wet sauna) and heat alone (a dry saune). Do recovery times improve? Is lung damage reversed? Please help those suffering from lung damage by testing these possible treatments. Also, should Covid-19 recovered people work their lungs a lot with aerobic exercises like running, fast walking, etc? Is this a good thing to do after recovery? Can strenuous aerobic exercise for 45 to 60 minutes or more help lungs recover, and possibly reverse coronavirus lung damage?  People: please do NOT do this while you are infected. And please be aware that the course of an infection can wax and wane. Often people who are positive for Covid-19 will feel much better after a week or 10 days, return to their "normal" lives, and then feel even sicker than how they felt with the original onset of symptoms, for a week or two. Sometimes this "cycle" repeats again! You need your strength to recover, so it is not advised to do any strenuous exercise until you are clearly in the recovery phase, and stop sleeping for abnormally long periods of time.